Crime - Organised -Institutionalised -
Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial
chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee,
in place but in contempt of all law:
"The court has inherentjurisdiction
to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act
of State". (And by
extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other
public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible,
including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered
in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to
directly from here) .
free4all.htm KEY PageChanges 20 Sep 2003
Fraud - Free For All (Page created July 1999)
| JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you
have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with
others against the offenders. Join in a class action.
Affiliated Sites For
The Above Projected Action lbduk.org
KEY to page
1. This Page - List
2. More Site-Pages -
3. LETTERS TO - List
4. LETTERS FROM - List
5. Police - Falsified
6. Personalities - Quotes
7. The Press / Media - LIES
9. Guilty Authority
10. No Waffle / Falsehoods
Public Servants Party To It All And
12. They Rely on Courts to endorse
13. Earlier Press Release
Finance It All Fraud & Corruption.
A. Page Quotes
1. The privileged benefit from a free for all and Mr & Mrs
2. One editor only, ever, acted on information
we furnished the press barons
3. The editor's conclusion confirmed our own
4. Benefit fraud running out of control and rising
5. Local Authorities have done little
or nothing to stop cheats making bogus claims
6. 2 billion each year was lost in housing benefit alone
7. Thousands bogus claims unearthed and thousands more
go through unchecked
8. Tories accused ...Alistair
Darling for failing to force Town Hall chiefs.
Tory D Willets Suggested 50 percent of Authorities virtually do nothing
10. At least 164
Authorities failed to mount a single successful prosecution
11. 74 Local
Authorities kept no data on the subject
12. 50 percent of Councils
failed to prosecute anyone successfully in 1999-2000 for Benefit Fraud
13. Only one Council has been told
to improve its performance
A spokesman said 24 thousand were taken to court cautioned / sanctioned
Government claimed to have saved 100 million BUT 1.28 billion was OVERPAID
We cannot be certain ... but there has been some drop ...
17. Government on
track for 10 per cent reduction in benefit fraud and error.
Their staff are trained to steal & misappropriate
Police beneficiaries from the stolen funds fail to prosecute the criminals.
Rights To Protection Under The Law Exist NOT.
21. Breaches of European Union Law Are Torts And Under Such
Provisions The Victims Can Act Jointly...
Order Posted Late With Fraudulent Intentions
Fraud Hijacking Court Actions Through Malpractice Abuse Of Rules
24. Alleged Impartial
Judges Partake In Scams To Impose Undeclared Policies / Plans
Manipulate The System & Milk Their Victims
Pages - Quotes Hyperlinked numbers below lead to page material.
Hyperlinked text leads to other material and pages.
They give your money away and ignore the
They handle the funds as Benefit Agencies
3. For No Waffle Or Lies...
4. It is as if..... judicial chair occupants are empowered to endorse
theft and crime, fraudulent activities.
Rogue LETTING AGENCIES
Page CHANGES - List
Site re-construction for better
navigation Page last revised : June 20, 2012
URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we
were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and
knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the
alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and
rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of
the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most
profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they
know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our
exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines on Navigating through the
extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the
reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been
implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the
date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in
the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or
new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
Facts & Realities. The
free for all that the privileged, in the UK benefit from and ENJOY, at the expense of
Mr and Mrs Average. Fraudulent conversions through the taxes imposed on the citizens by
successive governments. (Access the explicit page(1*) that
covers the confidential arrangements between seasoned con artists(2*) who are educated in such matters, in the best education
centres in the world'; our law courts. The Tax Payers(15*) who finance the realities we expose,
are kept in the dark care of the condescending media barons (3*),who
attend secret conspiratorial meetings with self appointed dictators, who have been
operating out of alleged democratic states for decades.
Below a Government Press Release(Key13) & An Article From
the Daily Mail of Tuesday, July 31 2001. Nothing but that which we have been pointing to and drawing the attention of
the media and the press barons to. The very facts which many in public office have known
of and used for far too long in the execution of undisclosed plans. Only one editor /
press baron ever acted on the information we furnished. We
published that fact and ever since we have been drawing attention to the editor's
conclusion because he confirmed our own observations and findings (4*Link to page).
FRAUD FREE-FOR-ALL (We reported it in 1996)
Labour's crackdown flops
By John Deans - Chief Political Correspondent
BENEFIT fraud is
continuing to run out of control despite Government pledges to crack down on the
problem, official figures reveal.
authorities have done little or nothing to stop cheats making bogus claims for housing
and council tax benefit, the statistics suggest.
Yesterday, the Tories accused Secretary
for Work and Pensions Alistair Darling of failing to live up to his pledge to force a more
robust strategy on town hall chiefs.
In its 1997 election
manifesto, Labour claimed that up to £2billion was lost each year in housing benefit
fraud and promised to 'start' with a clampdown on phoney claims, followed by persistent
action against benefit fraud of all kinds.
If Mr Blair had met that
pledge, the equivalent of £25 for every person in Britain would have been saved in
bogus housing benefit claims alone - enough for a 1p cut in the basic rate of income tax.
But while thousands of bogus housing benefit claims are unearthed, thousands more go
Following a study
of official statistics, Tory welfare spokesman David Willetts
suggested yesterday that in 50 per cent of local authorities virtually nothing is being
done to tackle the fraud scandal.
At least 164 of the 409
authorities in the UK failed to mount a single successful prosecution for fraud.
This includes Plymouth, Dover,
Dundee, Durham, Barnet, Barnsley, Milton Keynes, Northampton, Harrow, Southampton,
Leicester, the Medway towns and Tony Blair's constituency of Sedgefield. (*Link to a revealing case covering
'constructuve fraud activities' at Plymouth).
Another 74 have kept no data
on the subject, including Barking in East London, Basildon in Essex, Nottingham, Brighton
and Hove, Bristol, Burnley and Renfrewshire.
Mr Willetts said: `If the record of
these councils is the same as for those with data, then 50 per cent of all councils did
not successfully prosecute anyone for benefit fraud in the financial year 1999-2000.
`A year ago Mr Darling promised to get tough
with councils. Twelve months down the line and only one council has been told to improve
its performance. This is a scandal.'
his `get tough' campaign a year ago, Mr Darling said if councils failed to tackle
fraud, they could expect him to use his powers to direct them to do so. `They have been
warned,' he said. A spokesman for Mr Darling said yesterday that 24,000 people were taken
to court cautioned or sanctioned as a result of fraud crackdowns last year.
Government claimed to have saved £l00 million after a blitz on fraud and
over-payment. But official figures published yesterday said in the year to September 2000,
£l.28 billion was still overpaid - eight per cent of the total annual benefit bill.
Minister for Work Nick Brown
insisted the government was on track to hit its target of a 10 per cent reduction in
benefit expenditure related to fraud and error by March.
But a document
accompanying the figures said: `We cannot be certain the true drop in fraud and error
has been as great as 10 per cent but we can be confident that there has been some real
The statistics were based on a sample of 45,000 Income Support claims
and 29,000 Job Seeker's Allowance claims from 1.18 million receiving the former and
2.2million collecting the latter.
For no waffle, for no false accounting (*F2) of the
realities behind it all and for no misrepresentations of the facts visit the relevant
pages, we link you to, via the text from the Page Quotes List
FOR THE TRUTH AND THE FACTS, as to who and
for whom, also on what grounds we determined 'institutionalised fraud and rampant
corruption' you need to read the explicit Appeal we publish in our pages (*Link). Conveniently that Appeal was posted late and out of time
to co-operating fraudsters, the letting agents who were managing the properties of others,
targeted private landlords.
Dismissing the Appeal WITHOUT A HEARING, was posted late to persons who were
participating in the scams. The order, appealed from, was the result of hijacking and
railroading tactics. Nothing but the usual activities from within the courts. It was
posted late with intent, in order to create and generate the usual constructive frauds on
members of the unsuspecting public, via the Leave to Appeal ploy, instigated by the Court,
through the late posting.
Rampant fraudulent activities
by the experts who know how to manipulate their targeted victims into areas in which their
mates, from within the legal circles, thrive. They take for a ride, and to the
cleaners, their victims, milking them out of funds as they go along. They do so through
abuse of the courts' facilities, care of persons who misconduct in public office.
Judicial chair occupants, who
allegedly act impartially, take part in the scams and or simply impose the undeclared
policies of persons who never put such matters to the electorate care of the condescending
media barons and their stooges, the reporters all use / rely upon to misinform the
Look forward to an exclusive web-site and pages with more evidence
about the activities from within the Local Authorities that 'conveniently keep no
records'. Their 'organised disorganisation' we have been covering for at least NINE SOLID
Authorities engage in false accounting and their staff are trained to
steal Housing Benefit Funds, through misappropriation of funds they handle as Benefit
Agents. The said moneys, in law, belong to others;
to the providers of the accommodation that is used for persons who enter the country
illegally; the illegal migrants that flee to the land of milk and honey, are welcome by
local authority specialist trained teams. Then, THEY ARE USED AND TRAINED IN THE CIUKU
STANDARDS OF MORALITY THAT ARE INSTIGATED AND PROMOTED THROUGH THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND
THE LOCAL COUNTY COURTS! Read the explicit Appeal we publish and consider that a
member of the *human-rights.org* Community On Line was treated most abhorrently by the
very Local Authority that was using the 'refugees-cum-new British Citizens' in the manner
covered in the Appeal. Then consider the letter sent to the Home Secretary on 18th
December 1998 and the actions and miracles that materialised thereafter, as reported in
the local press.
Yes it is all organised, as we publish in our pages, by public servants!
For a better understanding and grasp of the above realities *Link to the NATIONAL SCANDAL pages. Use the links
provided to visit other relevant pages and documented evidence. (*Link below to an explicit letter / report to the
Head Quarters of the Social Security and consider the simplr fact that our alleged
servants JUST IGNORED IT ALL being part of the Organised Fraud On The Taxpayers and as the
protection racketeers lieutenants).
The page covers rampant fraud and corrupt practices. All instigated
from within the Local Authorities, Haringey Council, Hackney Council, Enfield Council to
name but a few, the latter two relying on the staff and officers of their local county
court to endorse, promote and even further enhance the potential for theft of funds and
the conversion of properties and assets to the self appointed Lords and Masters of the
Serfs upon whom they prey with third parties who operate from within the legal services.
Read the explicit Appeal we publish in the pages that cover such activities in the matter
of The Housing Benefit Funds And Other Assets Constructive Frauds, part of the thriving
Visit also other linked pages that cover the FREE FOR ALL activities
from within local authorities and the local county courts. The Authorities are not
helpless. All have their fingers in the honey-pot.
An old proverb points to the fact that: "The Fish Always Begins
To Rot In The Head - First".
Read all about the facts that FORGERIES WERE / ARE USED AND PROMOTED BY
HARINGEY COUNCIL STAFF and the co-operating in the scams Letting Agents. They indulge
freely and target properties and individuals FOR thefts of Housing Benefit and blunt
conversions of the misappropriated rents that are owing to the owners of the properties
targeted, to illicit legal costs orders. Such abuse of the courts' facilities leading to
repossession / enforced sales of the targeted properties.
police, on the payroll of the Local Authority, NOT CONTENT SIMPLY TO DEFAULT TO
PROSECUTE ANY OF THE CULPRITS, but they actually, wilfully and with
intent furnished false information to another government institution, in order to
cause additional damages to the targeted victims of crime. The evidence exists and it will
The Police as beneficiaries (their salaries/wages part of the stolen
and misappropriated funds - the Housing Benefit secured from central government for the
occupation of the properties of others know not of the provisions of Parliament. The theft
Acts and or the law on FORGERIES AND FALSE INSTRUMENTS, such as the illicit costs and
other county court orders THAT LACK ACCOUNTABILITY BY THE AUTHORS, are published in
invisible ink, as far as the police, the beneficiaries from the proceeds of criminal
activities, are concerned.
The citizens foot
the bill for the salaries and the wages of the reckless in order for the allegedly
incompetent and the CRIMINALLY MOTIVATED, who are retained and maintained on our behalf as
alleged public servants, TO BENEFIT FROM THEFT of moneys, properties AND THEFT OF THE
CITIZENS RIGHTS TO PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW!
If you know of any victims, who suffered theft of Housing Benefit for
which the local authority staff and officers were responsible, for such IMPOSED DAMAGES
THROUGH ABUSE OF PUBLIC OFFICE, draw their attention to the pages we point to at
*human-rights* or tell them to get in touch with:
*** firstname.lastname@example.org ***
Feel free to circulate this to any others you consider to be
interested, either as victims and or as persons who are engaged in challenging any kind of
wrongs the persons suffered because of defaults and omissions by the police and or
deliberate acts/omissions amounting to abuse of public office from persons retained in the
Law Enforcement Agencies, police and judiciary.
Contact *human-rights* directly if you have been the victim of FALSE
INSTRUMENTS or downright FORGERIES. For clarification access the page 'The LAW' - there
are plenty of links at the *human-rights* web-site.
Join a group we are putting together for a simple demand that:
"The offenders do receive the same attention under 'The LAW' as
Lord J. Archer.
MOST IMPORTANT, a CLAIM IN TORT (class action) CAN BE FORMULATED UNDER
EUROPEAN UNION LAW.
Forget the usual rubbish about Crown proceedings. Read what the
Executive (Government that creates law for the protectiond of the citrizens from crime and
criminals) and the Administrative (The Police and Judiciary who are retained to apply the
law to known / established practices and events). Read of the facility in place by
fraudsters who apparently are alowed to act as absolute dictators in our allegedly
civilised democracy. The arrogance of judicial chair occupants exists only care of our
representatives in government. (*Link to the evidence, proof of the arrogance of judicial
We are no longer serfs of the Middle Ages and public servants, retained
on our behalf to protect us, cannot act as arrogantly as they have been doing for
centuries. "The Law is a ass" (asserted, Charles Dickens) and "First we
kill the lawyers" (opined William Shakespeare) and such views were not born of fickle
DO NOTE that breaches
of European Union Law are torts in law and under such provisions, victims can and
should act jointly.
For more information and facts in law, the boffins ignore and shove
under their carpets / in their family closets, do contact *human-rights* directly. You
will be pointed to material published at *human-rights* for clarification. (*Link to exposures covering persons to indulge as
accessories to constructive frauds)
"The person who knows the truth and fails to proclaim it, is an accessory and
abettor to the work of the devil". (Andrew 1972)
11 May 1998
DSS - Room 2C10
Quarry House - Quarry Hill
Leeds - LS2 7UA
Our Ref. 11MHBOCF
Your Ref. Social Security Fraud
Attached hereto copy of a compilation of facts covering organised fraud through Housing
Benefit provisions abused by officials in collaboration with participating rogue letting
The document was transmitted to the office of the Rt. Honourable Prime
Minister before transmitting same to Max Clifford Associates because of the gravity of the
In the last four weeks I have come across more evidence as to the
practices indulged into by staff at the Benefits Section in Haringey Council and I submit
the following documented evidence: -
1. Communication dated 19.12.97 from Benefits Agency to Mr T Hadjoudj,
evincing ‘the submission of an out of date tenancy agreement’.
2. Copy of part of the out of the outdated (4/8/94) 6 month tenancy
agreement evincing rent set @ £220pw used and relied upon for over 3 years by claimant
and council staff.
3. THE actual agreement, both tenant and HOUSING BENEFIT staff at
Haringey Council, OUGHT TO HAVE SUBMITTED to the Benefits Agency evincing agreed rent @
£180pw as of 27 October 1997. The fact is that staff at Haringey Council were using
and relying on the initial £220pw agreement for well over three years, and in the
meantime the landlord was not even receiving rents from Bell Estates under various
In the instance at hand the staff of the Local Authority (Haringey
Council) had been remitting £165 per week to the ‘claimant’. BUT, with intent, the
very staff adamantly refused to give any information to the Landlord and or his agent.
Through defaults the staff of the Council encouraged deception by the tenant/claimant on
the landlord in the sum of £20 per week because the tenant was pleading over a long
period that only £145pw was remitted to him by the Social Security.
You must admit that the use of the original agreement and not the
subsequent, dated 27 October 1997, is highly questionable and was unjustified. Seeking
assistance/benefit at higher levels (council and claimant) while remitting a lot less to
the provider was and remains the most common practice. Staff of the very council had
declared a rent set at £107.50pw for premises for which the rent officer had previously
set a higher rent for other occupants. MONTHS later the staff were ‘cornered’ and they
disclosed rent set @£120pw. Thereafter remitting £12.50pw to a rogue letting agent LONG
AFTER the agent was no longer acting for the landlord AND WITHIN KNOWLEDGE OF THE COUNCIL
STAFF THET THE rogue letting agent WAS DISMISSED AND HAD BEEN THROWN OUT OF A COURT CLAIM
BY A COUNTY COURT JUDGE.
The practice of seeking/setting and securing higher rents from Central
Government, than what councils are remitting to landlords/property owners is the most
common of the offences. The double and triple tier is the cornerstone of creative
accountancy and intentionally confusing documentation by council staff and co-operating
rogue letting agents. One sum is claimed and set for a claim by the council, another sum
is reported and remitted to the tenant/claimant and yet another sum is eventually remitted
to the landlords / owners of the let properties. IF the landlords are to receive less,
eventually, than Central Government meets for a claim WHY the cuts for others in the
process? WHY NOT inform the landlords directly what they are to receive from Central
Government for any given property? Millions can be saved by cutting out the ‘self-help’
dishonest kickbacks by the organisers, who use all manner of deceit and devious devices to
suppress the facts which others, the police, in charge of investigating such crimes
(constructive frauds / deceptions / misappropriation of funds etc.) do not concern
In order to bring the message home I submit also two additional copy
documents from the Hadjoudj case: -
- Copy of authorisation from Mr and Mrs Hadjoudj issued to Diamond Lettings.
- Subsequent to securing satisfactory conclusion of the Housing Benefit claim, the
claimant allegedly delivered a letter, allegedly received from the landlord, to the
council handling funds belonging to others AS SECURED THROUGH USE OF THE TENNANCY
AGREEMENTS. The Tenancy Agreements clearly evince pre-existing liabilities as contracted.
On our part we have referred the council staff and officers to the provisions of the Theft
Acts. That letter the staff at Haringey Council used as their excuse for alleged direct
payments of all outstanding rents to the tenants. The criminal offence for the
introduction and use if that letter was dealt with accordingly by the private landlord who
was and remains a victim of deceptions and dishonest handling and misappropriation of the
Housing benefit funds; nothing but fraudulent activities leading to blunt corruption.
We do not have to elaborate on the relevant statutory provisions and
Sections of the Theft and Counterfeit Acts of Parliament. We do not have to refer you to
the Social Security Administration (Fraud) Act 1997. One need be no Einstein or a genius
to recognise CORRUPT PRACTICES.
The landlord signed a Section 9 Statement clearly qualifying the fact
that the letter allegedly from him to the tenant IS A FORGERY. Anyone, with common sense,
can understand why, the forgery was introduced by the council staff who, then failed to
refer the Section 9 Statement to the police. The Letting / Managing Agents of the
property, the council’s partners in deception and dishonest handling of funds belonging
to others, similarly defaulted. They also failed to deliver copies of the Section 9
Statement to the police.
The COUNCIL STAFF AND OFFICERS refused to and failed to deliver copies
of the alleged letter from the landlord to the tenant, particularly to the alleged author,
the private landlord. In the premises because of the blunt deceptions and the fraudulent
misrepresentations to the DSS, we are reporting to you the aforementioned Crimes fully
intending to exercise our rights in national and international law. As our adopted policy,
we shall be EXPOSING AND WE WILL BE DEALING WITH THE RAMPANT FRAUD AND CORRUPTION that the
council staff indulge in, as a matter of public/official policy. Public servants, and
their partners in deceptions, do so at the expense of ordinary citizens who spent a
lifetime of honest hard work through which to secure and create an investment, their
residential property. The elderly and the retired are the targeted victims, of the
practices. They are the most vulnerable who live in fear of the other area of rampant
deception and fraud, the legal circles and system as managed by the operatives, those who
are in charge and control of our courts, the court and the legal services.
We look to you for an acknowledgement and response proper. We expect
and demand that at the very least you will be referring the issues to Central Government
and that we be informed accordingly. You have sufficient information from which to proceed
with an official investigation at high level, such as the Public Auditors called in and or
in the alternative to inform us that you have referred to issues to the Serious Fraud
Office. We need only refer you to the directions of the Prime Minister to the Rt. Hon.
Frank Field to "Do the unthinkable" in order to bring down the high level of
fraud on the Social security Budget. YOU SHOULD, THEREFORE, ACT ACCORDINGLY if we are not
to surmise that the rampant Housing Benefit Fraud is not simply an issue of organised and
institutionalised fraud on the public – CORRUPTION on an unprecedented scale as a matter
of PUBLIC POLICY, because of ‘the government’s commitments in other areas’
Landlords Action Group
65 Abbott’s Park Road
London - E10 6HU
ENCL. Copies as text.
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview
published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was
making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the
coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE
RAMPANT FRAUD. IF IT WILL DEAL APPROPRIATELY with the criminals who abuse public office,
especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be
delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published
in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary
in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage
and consider "Why tolerate the
arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers
that the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime
Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had
secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only
interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides]. Access please the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link*
[*L] from here to the letter] and note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we
point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who
were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS
crowd / mob].
Evidently no one has ever
bothered to consider the relevant factors that apply to such scenarios. No one CARES,
irrespective of the words of many a dignitary? (*Link).
2. For a definition on false
instruments as covered by Statutory Provisions (Parliament's LAW) access the
introduction to a short compilation on law COVERING THEFT OF PROERTIES. Property also is
ANY RIGHT IN LAW - assured freedom or guaranteed security for and enjoyment of rights. (*Link to page with brief definition and relevant LAW links).
Back to: HomePage